Earlier this week, the popular crowdfunding service Patreon announced some controversial changes to the way it handles processing payments, and basically nobody's happy about it? To wrap our heads around the rocky future of media and react to 2017's Keighleys, CNET editor editor at large (and frequent guest of Giant Bomb's Beastcast podcast) Jeff Bakalar joined myself, Rob, and Austin. We also spend way too much time speculating about a 30 second teaser for FromSoftware's new game.
Itās extra weird because Austinās ad delivery is so straightforward and unaffected. It makes it sound like heās just interrupting someone to mention how much he loves his Google Home.
Which, come to think of it, might be by designā¦
ETA: my go-to replacement for saying ācrazyā or āinsaneā has somehow ended up being ābananasā or, sometimes, ābananacakes.ā
Ok did the ad kick in just as Rob said āthe more we learn about advertising efficacy the less impressive it gets-ā for everyone? Because Iād like to congratulate whoeverās responsible for that choice
I have to believe that it was intentionalāI refuse to believe that random chance could select the most perfect moment in the episode to drop the Google Home ad read.
Itās super disconcerting when Austin is like āhereās an ad for, idk, Google Home or somethingā and then the ad doesnāt play and Iām like⦠was that the ad?
The ad stuff is really starting to bother me. It just starts to feel unprofessional at this point, and I canāt imagine an advertiser would be happy with it either.
I donāt know which is funnier: the ad placement being intentional or being an accident.
Watching the Google Home ads change slowly has been interesting. I remember when they were talking about the dissonance of gun violence and supporting video games with that violence after the Vegas shooting, and then an ad saying āStart listening without missing a shot!ā
I wonder if thereās a reason they canāt/donāt do ads for other products or services.